And here regardless of whatever Avid wants these boxes are build by DAD and DAD are pretty dammed smart. I would be very surprised if any sane engineering organization would produce a non-CoreAudio interface over Thunderbolt. So I'm wondering if the Thunderbolt 3 will also give the same increase in stability as HD Native did?ĭAD's Thunderbolt products are CoreAudio. We changed the playback engine to HD Native Thunderbolt, and noticed a marked improvement in stability. There were definite minor performance issues, and occasional audible clicks with this setup. I mainly bring this up because I recently had a system that was using Dante Virtual Soundcard as their main playback engine, and using it to connect to the MTRX STUDIO. (And before anyone mentions it, I know you can use HDX and HD Native as CoreAudio devices in Pro Tools, simultaneously sharing them with other applications, but then you lose that exclusive operational stability and it's a (B) type interface regardless of what processing is on the card). Will the Thunderbolt 3 interface for the MTXR Studio act like (A) and give Pro Tools exclusive access to it, or will it just be another CoreAudio device that can be accessessed by multiple applications at once? (B) is all other CoreAudio devices, which work just fine, but sometimes have problems because other applications on the computer can access the same driver simultaneously causing a hiccup or crash. (A) is HDX and HD Native, which I would say are "direct" connections with Pro Tools and tend to have very stable operation since they take exclusive ownership of the drivers when used. Does anyone know how the new Thunderbolt 3 interface for the MTRX STUDIO will act with Pro Tools and CoreAudio?Ĭurrently there are two "classes" of playback engine,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |